Skip to content

Optimising QA Workflows with DORA’s Lead Time for Changes Metric

The pressure to deliver high-quality software quickly has never been greater. Quality Assurance teams often find themselves walking a tightrope between maintaining thorough testing practices and meeting aggressive delivery timelines. This is where DORA’s Lead Time for Changes (LTC) metric can be a valuable tool for QA teams looking to optimise their workflows without compromising on quality.

Understanding Lead Time for Changes: A QA Perspective

While Lead Time for Changes is traditionally viewed as a DevOps metric measuring the time from code commit to production deployment, its implications for QA teams run much deeper. For QA professionals, this metric serves as a mirror reflecting the efficiency of our testing processes and highlighting areas where we can make meaningful improvements.

Think of LTC as a story about your code’s journey from development to production. Within this story, QA plays a lead role – one that can either accelerate or delay the happy ending of successful deployment. The time spent in testing, bug investigation, regression cycles, and environment setup all contribute to this metric, making it a powerful lens through which we can examine our QA practices.

The Hidden Costs of Extended Lead Times

Long lead times can have far-reaching consequences across the entire development ecosystem. When testing cycles stretch out, we often see a cascade of effects:

  • Features pile up in the testing queue, creating bottlenecks
  • Development teams lose momentum as they context-switch between old and new features
  • Customer feedback loops become extended, potentially leading to misaligned solutions
  • Team morale can suffer as progress feels slow and victories become too spread out

Where to Focus First

Rethinking Test Suite Architecture

One of the most impactful ways QA teams can reduce lead times is through thoughtful test suite analysis and optimisation. Consider the case of a major e-commerce platform that recently underwent this process. Their team discovered that 40% of their test execution time was spent on redundant test cases that weren’t providing additional coverage. By consolidating these tests and implementing smart test selection strategies, they cut their average lead time by 30%.

The key is to approach your test suite with both a microscope and a telescope – examine individual tests for efficiency while keeping the bigger picture of overall coverage in mind. Ask questions like:

  • Which tests consistently take the longest to run?
  • Are there opportunities to parallelise test execution?
  • Could some end-to-end tests be replaced with faster integration tests without losing overall coverage?

Automation

While test automation isn’t new, using LTC as a guide can help teams make more strategic automation decisions. Instead of trying to automate everything, focus on areas that will have the biggest impact on your lead time:

Consider starting with:

  1. Regression test suites that run frequently
  2. Environment setup and tear-down procedures
  3. Data preparation and validation steps
  4. Common smoke test scenarios

Remember, automation isn’t just about converting manual tests to automated ones – it’s about rethinking your entire approach to quality assurance. Modern QA teams are increasingly adopting practices like continuous testing, where automated tests run throughout the development pipeline rather than just at designated “testing phases.”

Environment Management Is The Hidden Time Sink

One often-overlooked factor in lead times is environment management. Many teams I’ve worked with discovered that their actual test execution time was dwarfed by the time spent waiting for environments to be ready or dealing with environment-related issues.

The solution lies in treating test environments with the same rigour as production environments:

  • Implement infrastructure as code to ensure consistency
  • Use containerisation to enable quick environment creation and tear-down
  • Maintain parallel environments for different types of testing
  • Automate environment health checks and config updates

Implementing Changes: A Practical Framework

Transforming your QA workflows doesn’t happen overnight. Here’s a proven approach to making sustainable improvements:

  1. Start with Measurement Begin by breaking down your current lead time into its component parts. Use tools and metrics to understand exactly where time is being spent in your testing process. This baseline data will be important for identifying improvement opportunities and measuring success.
  2. Set Realistic Goals Rather than aiming for arbitrary improvements, set goals based on your team’s specific context and capabilities. A helpful approach is to establish a series of progressive targets, each building on the last.
  3. Prioritise and Execute Use your lead time analysis to identify quick wins and high-impact changes. Create a roadmap that balances immediate improvements with longer-term strategic changes.
  4. Monitor and Adjust Implement continuous monitoring of your lead time metrics and establish regular review cycles to assess the impact of changes. Be prepared to adjust your approach based on real-world results.

Maintaining Quality While Reducing Lead Time

A common concern when focusing on lead time reduction is the potential impact on quality. However, experience shows that thoughtful optimisation often leads to improved quality alongside faster delivery. The key is to:

  • Maintain robust quality gates while streamlining how quickly work can flow through them
  • Use automation to increase test coverage and consistency
  • Implement continuous testing practices that catch issues earlier
  • Focus on preventing defects rather than just detecting them

Looking Ahead

As we continue to evolve our QA practices, new opportunities for lead time optimisation emerge. Machine learning-driven test selection, AI-assisted defect prediction, and advanced automation frameworks are just some of the tools that will help teams further reduce their lead times while maintaining high quality standards.

Lead Time for Changes can be a catalyst for meaningful improvement in how we approach quality assurance. By understanding and optimising this metric, QA teams can play a role in delivering high-quality software faster and more efficiently.

The goal is to create a more efficient, effective, and enjoyable testing process that delivers better software to your users. Start small, measure consistently, and keep iterating. The improvements you make today will compound over time, leading to significant benefits for your team and your organisation.